CrossMark
8.0#2 in pc benchmark toolsFree planFree planAndroidiOSLinuxmacOS
VisitCrossMark vs fio
What both publish
| Fact | CrossMark | fio |
|---|---|---|
| CLI or automation | Yes | Yes |
| Comparison database | Yes | No |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 1992 | 2006 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Operating systems | Windows,macOS,Linux,ChromeOS,iOS/iPadOS,Android | Linux,Solaris,AIX,HP-UX,macOS,NetBSD,OpenBSD,Windows,FreeBSD,DragonFly |
| Result export formats | PDF with embedded XML attachment | normal text,terse (semicolon-delimited),JSON,JSON+,bandwidth/latency logs |
| Workload areas | The benchmark assesses Productivity, Creativity and Responsiveness. | Storage I/O: read,write,trim,mixed workloads; bandwidth,IOPS,and latency |
CrossMark plans
- FreeFree
- BasicPriced on request
- Basic—
- ProPriced on request
- Pro—
- Windows 7-Day TrialFree
fio plans
- fioFree
Pick CrossMark if…
CrossMark suits people who want to compare device performance across productivity, creativity, and responsiveness workloads. Businesses needing commercial use of results should consider the Multi-OS Suite and its license terms.
Pick fio if…
fio suits technical users who need configurable storage I/O workloads, result exports or data verification. Its job files and CLI or automation support can fit scripted performance testing and bug reproduction.