CrateDB
8.4#1 in spatial databasesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCrateDB vs SedonaDB
What both publish
| Fact | CrateDB | SedonaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2025 |
| Integrations | Documented integrations include Tableau Cloud, Power BI, Kafka, StreamSets, DBeaver, Prometheus, Grafana, Airflow, Superset, Metabase, Excel and n8n. | The project describes interoperability with PyArrow-compatible libraries including GeoPandas, DuckDB, and Polars. |
| Security | CrateDB describes authentication, authorization, encryption, audit logging and compliance certifications across managed and self-managed deployments. | The repository page links to a Security policy, but the opened page does not state specific security certifications or compliance claims. |
CrateDB plans
- Shared FreeFree
- Shared—
- Dedicated—
- Open SourceFree
- CrateDB Cloud Free PlanFree
- CrateDB Cloud Shared$0.07 a month
SedonaDB plans
- Apache SedonaDBFree
Pick CrateDB if…
CrateDB suits teams analyzing live operational data across varied formats who need SQL and horizontal scaling. It also fits users choosing between a managed Cloud service and deployment on their own infrastructure, including those seeking an Apache 2.0 open-source core.
Pick SedonaDB if…
SedonaDB suits developers and analysts working with geospatial data in local or single-node environments, especially through Python or SQL. Distributed workloads may call for the related SedonaSpark, SedonaFlink, or SedonaSnow projects.