Coveralls
6.9#4 in test coverage toolsFrom $10 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitCoveralls vs Microsoft Code Coverage
Microsoft Code Coverage
6.1#13 in test coverage toolsFree planFree planLinuxmacOSWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Coveralls | Microsoft Code Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Coveralls analyzes test coverage to show which parts of code are not covered by tests. | Measures what proportion of a project's code is exercised by coded tests such as unit tests. |
| Support | The pricing page offers a $200/month Support add-on with premium support, priority response, and live chat. | The repository invites users to report issues related to the Microsoft.CodeCoverage and dotnet-coverage NuGet packages and Visual Studio code coverage functionality. |
Coveralls plans
- Open SourceFree
- Starter$10 a month
- Usage add-on$30 a month
- Enterprise Cloud$35 a month
- Org$50 a month
- Org+$100 a month
Microsoft Code Coverage plans
- Microsoft Code CoverageFree
Pick Coveralls if…
Coveralls suits development teams that want coverage details by file and line, historical trends, and pull-request checks. Its free open-source option may suit maintainers of public projects; private repositories have paid plans starting at $10/mo.
Pick Microsoft Code Coverage if…
Microsoft Code Coverage suits developers measuring coverage in .NET test projects or other .NET applications. It is relevant to teams using supported test runners and operating systems, provided they account for instrumentation requirements.