EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Cosign vs CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted

Cosign

6.6#4 in code signing softwareFree plan
Free planLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
Visit

What both publish

FactCosignCyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted
PurposeCosign signs and verifies OCI containers and other software artifacts.Protects and governs use of private code signing keys managed by Trust Protection Foundation.
SupportThe project directs users with issues to open a GitHub issue or ask in its Slack channel.The maker says existing customers can continue to access product documentation, support, and guidance, and should use their existing support path for product-specific help.

Cosign plans

  • CosignFree

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted plans

No prices published.

Pick Cosign if…

Cosign suits open-source package managers and teams that need to sign or verify artifacts in registry and CI/CD workflows. It is less suited to developers seeking a stable API for direct application integration.

Pick CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted if…

It suits organizations that need to govern private code-signing key use with access restrictions, approvals, and auditing. It is also relevant to teams signing through Windows, Linux, or macOS clients within a Trust Protection Foundation deployment.

Charts they share