EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

CoSchedule vs EasyContent

CoSchedule

7.9#2 in campaign managementFrom $29 a month
Free planAndroidiOSWebExtension
Visit

What both publish

FactCoScheduleEasyContent
AudienceCoSchedule says it provides solutions for marketers from solopreneurs to enterprise-level marketing teams.The company describes Starter for solo creators and small teams, Studio for boutique agencies and in-house teams, and Enterprise for regulated teams.
IntegrationsOfficial integrations include WordPress, HubSpot, Canva, Zapier, Google Calendar ICS sync, Bitly, Mailchimp, Constant Contact, Campaign Monitor, ActiveCampaign, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, YouTube, Google Analytics, and RSS feeds.The product lists WordPress, Figma, Zapier, API, and webhooks; the Figma plugin also supports Google Sheets sync.
SecurityMarketing Suite customers can configure service-provider-initiated SAML single sign-on, and Marketing Suite includes security and access logs.The pricing page lists single sign-on (SSO) for Business and Enterprise plans and identifies Enterprise as an option for teams needing security review.
SupportCoSchedule offers email support and live chat with a human support specialist.All plans include email support, while Enterprise also includes an account representative.

CoSchedule plans

  • Starter$29 a month
  • Professional$49 a month
  • Free CalendarFree
  • SuitePriced on request

EasyContent plans

  • Starter$59 a month
  • Studio$129 a month
  • Team$209 a month
  • Business$499 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick CoSchedule if…

CoSchedule suits solo marketers and marketing teams that want to plan and publish social content in a calendar. It can also fit teams that need approvals, bulk scheduling, and reporting.

Pick EasyContent if…

EasyContent suits solo creators, small teams, agencies, and in-house content teams that need approvals and shared editing. Its Enterprise option is described for regulated teams.

Charts they share