EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

ConflictsCheck vs iManage Conflicts & Intake

What both publish

FactConflictsCheckiManage Conflicts & Intake
IntegrationsThe privacy policy names Stripe for subscription billing and Resend for transactional email; the opened maker pages do not state integrations with legal practice-management products.The product connects to Dun & Bradstreet, World-Check One and Bureau van Dijk for corporate affiliations and third-party risk information.
Intended usersThe product is aimed at solo attorneys and small law firms.The product is mainly used by professionals responsible for new-client onboarding involving conflicts searches, clearances and business intake.
PurposeRecords a firm's parties and matters, screens for potential conflicts of interest, and keeps an exportable audit trail of each check and decision.Conflicts & Intake streamlines client onboarding through conflicts checks, clearance and business intake.
SupportThe support and feedback page says the team reads submissions and replies when a response is needed; Small Firm includes priority support.iManage provides a Help Center with support, community forums, announcements and product downloads; Cloud Support is available 24x7 for Priority 1 requests.

ConflictsCheck plans

  • Individual$29 a month
  • Small Firm$99 a month

iManage Conflicts & Intake plans

  • Conflicts & IntakePriced on request

Pick ConflictsCheck if…

It is intended for solo attorneys and small law firms managing party records and conflict checks. Firms needing CSV onboarding, relationship matching, and exportable decisions may find it suitable.

Pick iManage Conflicts & Intake if…

It suits professionals responsible for new-client onboarding, especially teams handling conflicts searches, clearances, and business intake. iManage also describes it as an out-of-the-box option for small organizations seeking lower implementation complexity.

Charts they share