codoc
7.3#2 in paywall softwareFrom ¥9,800 a monthFree planWebAPIExtension
Visitcodoc vs InPlayer
What both publish
| Fact | codoc | InPlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | Compalyze lists codoc株式会社 as established in April 2019. | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan | London, United Kingdom |
| Integrations | Official integrations include WordPress plus examples involving Hatena Blog, Excite Blog and Kotobank. | The dashboard can connect to online video platforms and in-app platforms for in-app payments. |
| Payments | The feature list says buyers can pay by credit card, debit card, prepaid credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, or convenience store payment. | The paywall supports geo-pricing, multiple currencies and languages, and multiple payment and pricing options. |
| Paywall | A tag marks the paid section; that content is stored on codoc servers and delivered by JavaScript only after payment or authentication. | Its embeddable paywall supports authenticated pay-per-view and subscription access for videos or video collections. |
codoc plans
- codocFree
- codoc pro trialFree
- codoc pro¥9,800 a month
- enterprisePriced on request
InPlayer plans
- Custom pricingPriced on request
Pick codoc if…
codoc suits publishers, bloggers, and web service operators who want to take direct payments for content. It can fit sites using WordPress, Hatena Blog, or custom HTML or CMS.
Pick InPlayer if…
InPlayer suits content owners seeking to charge for video, audio, files, or HTML content. Its listed customers include rights owners, agencies, artists, and corporations, including live-event businesses.