CodeLocker vs SignPath
What both publish
| Fact | CodeLocker | SignPath |
|---|---|---|
| Access controls | Its zero trust architecture calls for identity verification and least privileged access, and the platform supports multifactor authentication. | Role-based access controls define who can sign which artifacts, when, and with which certificate. |
| Founded | 2005 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Fairfax, Virginia, USA | Vienna, Austria |
| Integrations | It integrates with source-code repositories and CI/CD build servers, and offers customizable plug-ins for third-party applications. | The company lists plugins and REST API integrations for GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and TeamCity. |
| Key security | The site says private keys remain in an HSM and describes centralized key management compatible with FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSMs. | SignPath says private keys are stored in FIPS-compliant HSMs and are never exposed or shared. |
| Purpose | CodeLocker is a code-signing platform for software supply-chain traceability and provenance. | SignPath provides code signing and software integrity tools that enforce policies across software builds and releases. |
CodeLocker plans
No prices published.
SignPath plans
- Open Source Code SigningFree
- Code GovernancePriced on request
- Software Integrity PlatformPriced on request
Pick CodeLocker if…
CodeLocker suits software developers and deployment engineers in regulated sectors such as defense, healthcare, device manufacturing, and finance. It is intended for teams needing controlled signing, provenance, and audit information.
Pick SignPath if…
SignPath suits development teams that need controls around signing and verifying software releases. Its free option is for qualifying open source projects; deployment choices also include self-hosted and hybrid.