CodeGuards.io
6.2#37 in code review softwareFrom €189 a monthWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitCodeGuards.io vs Cubic
What both publish
| Fact | CodeGuards.io | Cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | It supports GitLab cloud and self-hosted, GitHub cloud, CI mode, inline review comments, optional Slack notifications, and an MCP server. | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. |
| Product | CodeGuards reviews code changes using repository context, historical decisions, suppressions, and architecture expectations to identify security, architecture, and quality issues. | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. |
CodeGuards.io plans
- Code review€189 a month
- Security scans€189 a month
- Bundle — both products on one workspace€289 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Pick CodeGuards.io if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.