Cobalt
6.1#26 in static site generatorsLinuxmacOSWindows
VisitCobalt vs Jekyll
What both publish
| Fact | Cobalt | Jekyll |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The documentation describes deploying generated sites to GitHub Pages, GitLab Pages, or a self-hosted server. | Because output is static, Jekyll sites can be deployed manually, through automation or with third-party hosting. |
Cobalt plans
No prices published.
Jekyll plans
- JekyllFree
- Open-source JekyllFree
Pick Cobalt if…
Cobalt suits people who want a Markdown-based site workflow with local previews and configurable templates. It may also fit Emacs users and people deploying to GitHub Pages, GitLab Pages, or their own server.
Pick Jekyll if…
Jekyll suits people who want to generate static websites or blogs from text and layouts. It is also relevant to users comfortable installing its Ruby and build-tool requirements.