EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

ChiefOnboarding vs EmployeeConnect

ChiefOnboarding

6.7#13 in employee onboarding softwareFrom €249 a month
Free planWebAPISelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactChiefOnboardingEmployeeConnect
HeadquartersNetherlandsDarlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
HostingThe product can be self-hosted, and the maker says customer data stays under the customer's control.EmployeeConnect says its data is hosted in geographically redundant Microsoft Azure data centres.
IntegrationsThe integration catalog lists account provisioning and webhook integrations including Teamtailor, BambooHR, Azure Active Directory, Asana, Zendesk, Google, and Slack.Published integration partners include KeyPay, Xero, QuickBooks, NetSuite, Seek, Microsoft Active Directory, MYOB, Sage, Zapier and learning platforms.
Intended usersThe product is described as helping HR, IT, managers, buddies, and new hires structure onboarding, including for remote teams.EmployeeConnect says its tailored implementation approach is intended to fit businesses of different sizes and levels of complexity.
Learning resourcesResources can be presented as wiki-style pages or converted into courses with questionnaires.EmployeeConnect offers a knowledge base containing how-to videos and guides, as well as FAQs.

ChiefOnboarding plans

  • Support€249 a month
  • Free—

EmployeeConnect plans

  • Payroll Standard$4 a month
  • Payroll Plus$6 a month
  • CIRRUS$8 a month
  • HR Cirrus$8 a month
  • BasicA$8 a month
  • Payroll Pro$10 a month

Pick ChiefOnboarding if…

ChiefOnboarding suits organizations structuring onboarding across HR, IT, managers, buddies, and new hires, including remote teams. Self-hosting is an option for organizations that want customer data under their control.

Pick EmployeeConnect if…

It suits businesses seeking HR and payroll processes in one system, particularly those needing the listed Australian compliance features. The company says its tailored implementation approach is intended for businesses of different sizes and complexity.

Charts they share