Checkend
5.9#26 in error monitoring softwareFree planFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitCheckend vs Sankofa Catch
Sankofa Catch
8.0#2 in error monitoring softwareFrom $9 a monthFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Checkend | Sankofa Catch |
|---|---|---|
| API | The full REST API supports managing apps, problems, teams, and users with fine-grained permissions. | The REST API uses https://api.sankofa.dev, x-api-key authentication for ingestion and bearer JWTs for dashboard or management calls. |
| Integrations | The available Ruby integrations listed are Rails, Sinatra, Rack, Sidekiq, and Resque. | The documented integrations are Sankofa Switch, Deploy, Plan, Slack, PagerDuty and generic webhooks. |
| Security | The site states that Checkend provides encrypted storage for sensitive data, secure tokens, session management, and password history protection. | The security page states that data is encrypted in transit with TLS 1.3 and at rest with AES-256-GCM, and that server-side keys are kept behind the customer's KMS. |
Checkend plans
- FreeFree
Sankofa Catch plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$9 a month
- Booster pack$10, paid once
- Pro$24 a month
- Growth$60 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Checkend if…
Checkend suits teams that want to host error monitoring on their own servers and keep error data there. Its Ruby and Python support, team controls, and app-specific notification rules may fit development teams managing multiple applications.
Pick Sankofa Catch if…
Catch suits indie makers, SaaS teams, startups, and scale-ups needing crash, performance, release, and replay monitoring. It also fits organizations wanting cloud or self-hosted deployment and SDK coverage across web, mobile, and backend stacks.