CFR
6.3#14 in reverse engineering toolsFree planFree planAPILinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitCFR vs rev.ng
What both publish
| Fact | CFR | rev.ng |
|---|---|---|
| License | The maker’s FAQ directs users to the project README for its license; the project repository identifies the license as MIT. | The overall framework is GPLv2 because it depends on GPLv2 components such as QEMU, while individual files use MIT licensing. |
| Support | The maker invites users to email reports of problems and directs bug reports to the GitHub issue tracker. | The site points users to Discourse for questions, feedback, and problem reports, and also offers a Discord community and email contact. |
CFR plans
- FreeFree
rev.ng plans
- Open sourceFree
- Public projectFree
- Private projectPriced on request
- StandalonePriced on request
Pick CFR if…
CFR suits developers who need Java source from class files or JARs, including class files from other JVM languages. It may also suit projects that need command-line or API access to decompilation.
Pick rev.ng if…
rev.ng may suit reverse-engineering users who need C output, structure recovery, and API or YAML-based workflow options. Its listed platforms cover desktop operating systems as well as browser and API access.