EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

CaseFox vs iManage Conflicts & Intake

CaseFox

8.7#1 in legal practice management softwareFrom $45 a month
Free planAndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactCaseFoxiManage Conflicts & Intake
FoundedCaseFox says it launched in 2011 as a legal billing and case management tool in Silicon Valley, California.1995
HeadquartersSilicon Valley, CaliforniaChicago, United States
IntegrationsListed integrations include LawPay, PayPal, QuickBooks, Xero, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Google Docs, Microsoft 365, Google Calendar, Excel and Keap.The product connects to Dun & Bradstreet, World-Check One and Bureau van Dijk for corporate affiliations and third-party risk information.
Intended usersCaseFox says it serves solo practitioners, small and mid-sized firms, large firms, and enterprise legal teams across diverse practice areas.The product is mainly used by professionals responsible for new-client onboarding involving conflicts searches, clearances and business intake.
SecurityThe company says it uses SSL, encryption, database replication, backups, mirror-server recovery and restricted server access.The product page says organizations can control access to sensitive client content during intake and onboarding and set security policies for onboarding documents.

CaseFox plans

  • SoloFree
  • Professional$45 a month
  • Enterprise$99 a month

iManage Conflicts & Intake plans

  • Conflicts & IntakePriced on request

Pick CaseFox if…

CaseFox suits solo practitioners and legal teams that need case management, billing, and trust-account tools together. It also lists CPAs, consultants, and investigators among its intended users.

Pick iManage Conflicts & Intake if…

It suits professionals responsible for new-client onboarding, especially teams handling conflicts searches, clearances, and business intake. iManage also describes it as an out-of-the-box option for small organizations seeking lower implementation complexity.

Charts they share