Carbide Network
7.6#4 in decentralized storage services$0.01 usage-basedFree planAndroidiOSAPImacOS
VisitCarbide Network vs Pinata
What both publish
| Fact | Carbide Network | Pinata |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The developer docs describe settlement through Solana programs and USDC payments, and state that the discovery service can be self-hosted. | The homepage documents a TypeScript SDK installed with npm i pinata and shows an example using the PinataSDK. |
| Product | Carbide describes itself as a decentralized storage network that connects users’ files with a global network of providers. | Pinata provides file uploads and retrieval using IPFS storage and also offers hosting and management for Pinata Agents. |
| Support | The developer docs identify Telegram as the fastest way to reach a contributor and GitHub issues as an option for tracked work. | The pricing page lists email support for the free plan and describes enterprise support as top-priority 1:1 support. |
Carbide Network plans
- Home providerFree
- Personal storageFree
- Professional providerFree
- Enterprise provider$0.01 a month
Pinata plans
- Picnic$20 a month
- Fiesta$100 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
- Free—
Pick Carbide Network if…
Carbide may suit individuals seeking encrypted storage for personal files and organizations needing team controls or geographic redundancy. Developers can also consider its API-first, S3-compatible storage.
Pick Pinata if…
Pinata suits developers adding IPFS file handling to an application, from people starting out to businesses scaling up. Its storage, gateways, and CDN may also suit teams serving website content.