c7n-left
5.5#19 in infrastructure as code security softwareLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
Visitc7n-left vs Kyverno
What both publish
| Fact | c7n-left | Kyverno |
|---|---|---|
| CI integration | Its GitHub output mode reports annotations directly into pull requests. | Official documentation provides GitHub Actions workflows for testing policies in continuous integration. |
| Intended users | The documentation says c7n-left is typically run in CI systems. | The project describes Kyverno as designed for platform engineering teams and enabling security, compliance, automation, and governance through policy as code. |
| Policy language | Policies support standard Custodian filters, multiple resource types, taggable-resource filtering, and multi-hop resource graph traversal. | Kyverno supports CEL-based policy types and describes applying Kubernetes-style policies outside Kubernetes as part of its mission. |
| Purpose | c7n-left evaluates Cloud Custodian policies directly against infrastructure-as-code source assets. | Kyverno is a Kubernetes-native policy engine for defining and enforcing policy as code. |
c7n-left plans
No prices published.
Kyverno plans
- KyvernoFree
- Open-source coreFree
Pick c7n-left if…
c7n-left suits cloud teams that want to check Terraform changes against Cloud Custodian policies, especially in CI systems. It is useful for teams working with supported cloud resources and pull-request workflows.
Pick Kyverno if…
Kyverno is intended for platform engineering teams managing security, compliance, automation, and governance through policy as code. It suits teams working with Kubernetes clusters and policy checks in CI pipelines.