Bluescape
5.6#28 in collaborative whiteboard softwareWebAPImacOSSelf-hosted
VisitBluescape vs Miro
What both publish
| Fact | Bluescape | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Bluescape describes the service as intended for business use and says it is used by distributed teams, government agencies, and Fortune 100 companies. | Miro says its workspace serves teams of any size and reports use by more than 100 million users in 250,000 organizations. |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, United States | San Francisco and Amsterdam |
| Integrations | The integrations page lists Microsoft Teams, OneDrive, Microsoft 365 editions, Webex, Box, Autodesk Flow Production Tracking, and n8n. | Miro lists more than 250 integrations, including Microsoft, Slack, Google and Adobe services. |
| Product | Bluescape offers a secure, scalable workspace described as an infinite canvas for teams to gather and collaborate on files. | Miro describes itself as a collaborative visual workspace where teams work with AI to develop strategy, design products and services, and manage processes. |
Bluescape plans
- Paid subscriptionPriced on request
Miro plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$8 a month
- Business$20 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Bluescape if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Miro if…
Miro suits teams that need a shared visual space for planning, mapping, workshops, or product work. The free plan may fit users who can work within its limit of three editable boards.