Black Duck SCA vs Safety CLI
| Black Duck SCA | Safety CLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $25/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | BitBake, Cargo, Carthage, CocoaPods, Conan, Conda, CPAN, CRAN, Dart, Go, Gradle, Hex, Ivy, Lerna, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PEAR, pip, pnpm, Poetry, RubyGems, SBT, Setuptools, Swift, Yarn, Xcode, OPAM, UV, Rush | Python |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 25 /user/mo |
| Monitored projects | — | 25 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Safety CLI scores higher on our published basis.