Beelzebub
5.9#9 in honeypot softwareFree planFree planAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitBeelzebub vs OpenCanary
OpenCanary
6.5#2 in honeypot softwareFree planFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Beelzebub | OpenCanary |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The maker says the platform can run with Docker or Kubernetes across cloud and on-premises environments, with local model options for restricted and air-gapped evaluation. | The project documents installation on Ubuntu and macOS, plus Docker deployment on Linux hosts using host networking. |
| Protocols | The platform supports decoys for HTTP, SSH, Telnet, MCP, and other protocols. | Native service modules include SSH, FTP, Git, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP proxy, MSSQL, MySQL, Telnet, SNMP, SIP, VNC, Redis, TFTP, NTP, and TCP banner. |
| Purpose | Beelzebub deploys realistic decoys and canary credentials to detect attacker movement and provide investigation context to security teams. | OpenCanary is a multi-protocol network honeypot intended to detect attackers interacting with services on non-public networks. |
| Support | The FAQ lists GitHub issues and documentation for community support, and 24/7 phone and chat support for enterprise customers. | Bug reports are requested through GitHub, security vulnerabilities through the project security policy, and feature requests through the project tracker. |
Beelzebub plans
- Open sourceFree
OpenCanary plans
- OpenCanaryFree
Pick Beelzebub if…
Beelzebub suits security teams that want to study attacker activity using decoys, session summaries, and investigation agents. Its self-hosted core may fit teams that need local deployment options.
Pick OpenCanary if…
It suits administrators who want a self-hosted decoy for detecting interactions with network services. Linux provides the widest module options; macOS lacks SMB monitoring, and portscan monitoring is limited to Linux and disabled in Docker.