Ballpark
7.7#3 in usability testing softwareFrom $125 a monthAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitBallpark vs Maze
What both publish
| Fact | Ballpark | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Integrations | The integrations marketplace lists User Interviews, Figma and Rally connections. | Listed integrations include Figma, FigJam, Slack, Jira/Confluence, Miro, Notion, Google Calendar, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Office 365, Outlook.com, Amplitude and AI tools. |
| Product | Ballpark is a research platform for consumer, brand and product research, with surveys, interviews, video, voice, visuals and tasks. | Maze is a user and market research platform for running studies and bringing research findings into team decisions. |
| Prototype testing | Ballpark supports Figma prototype testing and interactive usability tasks such as first-click and five-second tests. | Teams can import prototypes and validate designs with usability studies before development. |
| Rating on Capterra | 0.0 out of 5 from 0 reviews. | 4.5 out of 5 from 10 reviews. |
| Rating on G2 | 4.6 out of 5 from 61 reviews. | 4.5 out of 5 from 111 reviews. |
Ballpark plans
- Free TrialFree
- Participant recruitmentPriced on request
- Starter$125 a month
- Business$229 a month
- Enterprise PlatformPriced on request
- Enterprise—
Maze plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$99 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Ballpark if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Maze if…
Maze suits teams that need to run user or market research across methods such as prototype tests, interviews, surveys, or card sorting. It can also fit teams that want AI-supported study creation and analysis, participant recruitment, or research integrations with their existing tools.