EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AwardScience vs Evalato

AwardScience logo

AwardScience

7.5#1 in awards management softwareFrom $149 a month
AndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit
Evalato logo

Evalato

6.3#6 in awards management software€2,500 one-time
Web
Visit

What both publish

FactAwardScienceEvalato
IntegrationsCapterra lists Salesforce Sales Cloud, Zapier, SAP BW/4HANA and Azure Active Directory External Identities as integrations.Evalato lists HubSpot and Intercom integrations and connection to 5,000+ apps through Zapier.
Intended usersThe product is presented for program managers, applicants, judges, sponsors, and auditors running grants, scholarships, awards, or accelerator programmes.Evalato describes its customers as organizers running awards and other programs, and reports serving over 7,000 customers across 80 countries and six continents.
Plan limitsThe Free Trial includes 50 applications per year and 1 GB storage, while Enterprise lists unlimited applications and custom storage.Grow plans cap entries at 50, 100, or 200 and file uploads at 20MB each; Pro includes up to 10,000 entries and unlimited file size.
PurposeAwardScience runs award, grant, scholarship, and nomination programmes end to end in one workspace.Evalato collects program submissions, supports judging and evaluation, and helps organizers recognize winners across awards, competitions, grants, scholarships, and similar programs.

AwardScience plans

  • Free TrialFree
  • Essentials$149 a month
  • Pro$499 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Evalato plans

  • Grow 50€2,500, paid once
  • Grow 100€3,500, paid once
  • Grow 200€4,500, paid once
  • Pro€5,500, paid once
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick AwardScience if…

AwardScience is aimed at program managers, applicants, judges, sponsors, and auditors running awards, grants, scholarships, or accelerator programmes. Its plans and workflows cover both smaller programmes and Enterprise use.

Pick Evalato if…

Evalato is aimed at organizers running awards and other submission-based programs. It may suit teams that need configurable entry and judging processes, with plan limits matched to program size.

Charts they share