Auto
5.9#8 in release automation toolsLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
VisitAuto vs Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
7.3#1 in release orchestration softwareFrom $4,330 a yearFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Auto | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The documented plugins include Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Amazon S3, GitHub Pages, npm, Homebrew, Docker, and VS Code. | Octopus integrates with CI tools including GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and TeamCity, and its pricing page lists ITSM integrations such as ServiceNow and Jira Service Management. |
| Intended users | Auto is designed for project teams that want to automate releases in continuous integration, while its commands can also be run locally. | Octopus describes itself as a CD platform for modern software teams, from small teams to large Fortune 100 organizations. |
| Support | The repository invites users to file an issue or open a pull request for help and contributions. | Plan support ranges from community support on Free to 8/5 weekday support on Professional and 24/7 support on Enterprise. |
Auto plans
No prices published.
Octopus Deploy plans
- Machines add-on$770 a year
- Tenants add-on$770 a year
- Professional$4,330 a year
- Enterprise$24,600 a year
- Free—
- Premium Support add-onPriced on request
Pick Auto if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Octopus Deploy if…
Octopus Deploy suits software teams automating releases and deployments across cloud services, virtual machines, and Kubernetes. It offers both self-managed and hosted deployment options.