AuthLite vs IDmelon
| AuthLite | IDmelon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Android, api, extension, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Supported factors | YubiKey OTP and challenge-response, OATH TOTP authenticator apps, OATH hardware tokens, OnlyKey | FIDO2 passkeys/security keys; smartphones; contactless cards and ID badges; NFC cards; fingerprints; Face ID/biometrics; SMS OTP; email OTP; phone-call verification |
| App integration methods | Active Directory native authentication, Group Policy, Microsoft NPS/IAS RADIUS, LDAP, Remote Desktop Protocol, VPN integration | SAML 2.0; OIDC; REST API; existing identity-provider integration; custom SAML application integration |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | Yes |
| Passwordless authentication | No | Yes |
| Device trust controls | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Everything Xiaomi, IDmelon scores higher on our published basis.