AURIX Development Studio vs Raspberry Pi Pico SDK
| AURIX Development Studio | Raspberry Pi Pico SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | extension, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Debugger included | Yes | — |
| SDK components | Over 150 peripheral Components; communications library for I2C, USB, UART, SPI, CAN, LIN, and Bluetooth Low Energy; analog peripherals; dynamically generated APIs; Peripheral Driver Library | C/C++ and assembly headers, hardware APIs, hardware and high-level libraries, networking libraries, runtime infrastructure, CMake build system |
| Target architectures | 8051; Arm Cortex-M0/M0+; Arm Cortex-M3; Arm Cortex-M4 | RP2040 Arm Cortex-M0+; RP2350 Arm Cortex-M33 and Hazard3 RISC-V |
| Host platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Build systems | Native PSoC Creator project build; exported Makefile workflow | CMake |
| Debug interfaces | CMSIS-DAP; KitProg2; KitProg3; PSoC Programmer | SWD, USB-to-SWD, UART, OpenOCD and GDB |
| License model | free proprietary | open-source |
Both are listed in Best Embedded Systems Toolchains. On Everything Xiaomi, Raspberry Pi Pico SDK scores higher on our published basis.