AuraQuantic
6.1#32 in business process management softwareAndroidiOSWebSelf-hosted
VisitAuraQuantic vs Flowable
What both publish
| Fact | AuraQuantic | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | 100% web-based | Flowable can run on customer infrastructure using Docker and Helm charts. |
| Forms | Dynamic drag-and-drop form design | Forms are built using a drag-and-drop editor. |
| Integrations | REST, SOAP, SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft 365 and Google Suite connectors | Connectors include Salesforce, SharePoint, ABBYY, RPA Framework and Apache Camel. |
| Monitoring | Real-time monitoring and control | Runtime engines can be visualized and monitored with reports through the Control dashboard. |
AuraQuantic plans
- CustomPriced on request
- StandardPriced on request
- StarterPriced on request
Flowable plans
- Community EditionFree
- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Flowable Platform$99 a month
- Agentic Case PlatformPriced on request
- Case PlatformPriced on request
Pick AuraQuantic if…
AuraQuantic suits organizations seeking to automate processes and build no-code applications, including teams with changing operational needs. Its deployment options include client-chosen infrastructure, and workload channels extend beyond the web and mobile app to email and SMS.
Pick Flowable if…
It suits organisations coordinating casework and processes across people, systems, and AI agents, particularly in banking, insurance, healthcare, and government. Teams can choose between cloud deployment and running engines in their own application or infrastructure.