EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AttackIQ Platform vs Skyhawk Security BAS

What both publish

FactAttackIQ PlatformSkyhawk Security BAS
DeploymentAttackIQ offers SaaS and on-premises software, and its federal solution is described as designed for on-premises operation.Skyhawk describes its platform as SaaS with agentless, API-based integration.
IntegrationsPublished integration materials name Microsoft 365, Palo Alto Panorama, ServiceNow, Splunk, Elastic, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Azure Sentinel, Okta, Qualys, Tenable and AWS-related services.Skyhawk describes integration with Wiz and AWS Inspector, GuardDuty, and Macie for ingesting security findings.
Intended usersAttackIQ says it serves Fortune 500 enterprises, federal agencies, and MSSPs.Skyhawk describes its platform for cloud security teams and says it also serves MSSPs through a multi-tenant platform.
PurposeAttackIQ describes its platform as a CTEM platform for modeling adversary behavior, prioritizing attack paths, validating controls, and measuring security improvement.Skyhawk’s Breach and Attack Simulation provides a continuous adversarial view of cloud environments to reveal missed attack paths and help prevent breaches.

AttackIQ Platform plans

  • Flex FreeFree
  • FreeFree
  • Pay-as-you-go$300, paid once
  • Flex Pay-as-you-go$300, paid once
  • Monthly$4,995 a month
  • Flex Monthly$4,995 a month

Skyhawk Security BAS plans

No prices published.

Pick AttackIQ Platform if…

AttackIQ describes its intended users as Fortune 500 enterprises, federal agencies, and MSSPs. It suits teams seeking to validate security controls and model attack paths across their environments.

Pick Skyhawk Security BAS if…

It suits cloud security teams and MSSPs needing continuous, agentless attack validation across AWS, Azure, or GCP. Teams can use it to prioritize exposures and verify response workflows without touching production.

Charts they share