EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AttackForge vs Dradis

AttackForge logo

AttackForge

6.3#11 in penetration testing softwareFrom $50 a month
WebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

Dradis

7.1#4 in penetration testing softwareFrom $3,600 a year
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactAttackForgeDradis
IntegrationsNamed integrations include Jira, ServiceNow, Azure DevOps, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Power BI, Tableau, HackerOne and BugCrowd.Dradis lists 47+ scanner, ticketing, and SSO integrations, including Nessus, Burp Suite, Nmap, Qualys, Jira, and Okta.
PurposeAttackForge manages offensive security testing from planning and execution through reporting, remediation and retesting.Dradis supports security assessment work from engagement kickoff and collaboration through reporting, remediation, and workflow automation.
ReportingIts ReportGen engine creates branded reports using customizable templates and supports command-line report generation.Dradis uses structured data, templates, and automation to produce consistent assessment deliverables.
SecurityThe pricing page identifies AttackForge as SOC 2 Type II certified and says Enterprise can use dedicated infrastructure or self-hosted deployment.Dradis is self-hosted, can run without an internet connection, and the maker says it does not have access to customer data.
SupportEnterprise includes SLA-backed support, a dedicated Customer Success Manager, training workshops and onboarding.Paid plans include email and live chat support, and Community Edition users can ask questions on the forum.

AttackForge plans

  • Pro$50 a month
  • Team$150 a month
  • Consultancy$300 a month
  • SME$800 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Dradis plans

  • Community EditionFree
  • Assess$3,600 a year
  • Remediate$7,200 a year
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick AttackForge if…

You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.

Pick Dradis if…

Dradis suits security assessment teams that need to collaborate on findings, apply defined methodologies, and produce structured reports. Internal security teams that also need to track remediation can consider Remediate, while teams delivering assessments can consider Assess.

Charts they share