Arweave
6.4#11 in decentralized storage servicesAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitArweave vs Carbide Network
Carbide Network
7.6#4 in decentralized storage services$0.01 usage-basedFree planAndroidiOSAPImacOS
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Arweave | Carbide Network |
|---|---|---|
| API | The protocol is based on HTTP and can be accessed using existing HTTP clients, including Axios, Fetch, and Guzzle. | The discovery service exposes a versioned API for provider registration and search, marketplace quotes, and health checks. |
| Integrations | The docs list client integrations for Go, PHP, Scala, Java, C#, JavaScript, TypeScript, and NodeJS. | The developer docs describe settlement through Solana programs and USDC payments, and state that the discovery service can be self-hosted. |
| Pricing model | The Arweave protocol documentation says upload fees scale with uploaded data volume and a portion goes to the storage endowment. | The site says provider marketplace pricing starts at $0.002/GB and providers compete on price and quality. |
| Support | The developer guide recommends Discord and the GitHub Discussions board for mining questions and support. | The developer docs identify Telegram as the fastest way to reach a contributor and GitHub issues as an option for tracked work. |
Arweave plans
No prices published.
Carbide Network plans
- Home providerFree
- Personal storageFree
- Professional providerFree
- Enterprise provider$0.01 a month
Pick Arweave if…
Arweave may suit people seeking permanent storage for important data or decentralized web apps, as well as developers using its HTTP protocol and listed client integrations. Its permanence caveat matters to anyone considering what to store.
Pick Carbide Network if…
Carbide may suit individuals seeking encrypted storage for personal files and organizations needing team controls or geographic redundancy. Developers can also consider its API-first, S3-compatible storage.