aqua
7.7#2 in test management softwareFrom €19 a monthFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
Visitaqua vs TestoQA
What both publish
| Fact | aqua | TestoQA |
|---|---|---|
| AI test generation | The product can generate requirements, test cases and test data from project input. | It generates test cases from user stories and requirements, including edge cases and error handling. |
| Deployment | aqua is offered as public cloud, private cloud or on-premise software. | The features page lists Docker or Node.js deployment and says data stays on the customer's servers. |
| Integrations | Documented integrations include Jira, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Selenium, JMeter, Ranorex, SoapUI and other testing tools. | The homepage lists Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, and REST API as integrations. |
| Product | aqua is an AI-powered requirements, test and defect management system for regulated industries, agencies and SaaS companies. | TestoQA is a test case management system for software development and QA teams. |
| Reporting | Dashboards, KPI alerts and a Report Wizard provide charts, external data and media for QA reporting. | Dashboards show pass/fail trends and metrics by tester, project, and date, with CSV or PDF export. |
| Support | The pricing FAQ says subscriptions include continuous support. | The Starter plan includes email support, Professional includes priority support, and Enterprise includes 24/7 phone support. |
aqua plans
- GuestFree
- Test Runner DEV — Full TR license, billed annually€19 a month
- Test Runner DEV — Full TR license, billed monthly€29 a month
- Test Runner DEV€29 a month
- Requirement Management — Full RM license, billed annually€89 a month
- aqua Suite€99 a month
TestoQA plans
- Professional$49 a month
- Starter—
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick aqua if…
aqua suits teams managing requirements and manual or automated testing across projects. Its cloud and on-premise deployment options and integrations may fit teams with varied testing and authentication needs.
Pick TestoQA if…
TestoQA may suit in-house QA teams, QA agencies, startups, and enterprises that need shared test management and progress reporting. Its self-hosted deployment and customer-server data handling may interest teams managing their own infrastructure.