Appetize
7.5#4 in device farm softwareFrom $59 a monthFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAppetize vs pCloudy
What both publish
| Fact | Appetize | pCloudy |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Its Appetize AI page names GitHub Actions, GitLab, Bitrise, and Jenkins as CI/CD integrations and also lists Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor support through the CLI and REST API. | Its integrations page lists tools and frameworks including Appium, Jira, Android Studio, GitHub, Slack, Selenium, Espresso, XCTest, Jenkins, and Azure Pipelines. |
| Security | Appetize states that it maintains an ISO 27001 security program, is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, and has a CSA CAIQ with over 260 controls across 17 domains. | Pcloudy states that it is SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and GxP compliant and uses AES-256 encryption and SAML-based SSO. |
| Support | The pricing page directs users to submit a support ticket and lists 24/7 support for Enterprise. | The pricing information lists 24×7 support for manual plans and 24×7 priority support for automation plans. |
Appetize plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$59 a month
- Premium$319 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
pCloudy plans
- Manual Testing — Browser Cloud (1 parallel test)$19 a month
- Manual Testing — Device Cloud (1 parallel test)$39 a month
- Automation Testing — Browser Cloud (1 parallel test)$99 a month
- Automation Testing — Device Cloud (1 parallel test)$139 a month
- Manual Testing — Browser Cloud (1 parallel test, annual)$182 a year
- Test Automation Agent add-on$200 a month
Pick Appetize if…
Appetize suits teams that need browser-accessible iOS and Android app previews, testing, or demos. It may also suit teams building Playwright tests or sharing uploaded apps through embedded sessions.
Pick pCloudy if…
It suits teams testing mobile and web apps across real devices or broad browser and operating-system combinations. Teams needing more than 10 parallel tests should expect to contact sales for custom pricing.