Apache Trusted Releases
5.7#27 in release management softwareWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitApache Trusted Releases vs Flagsmith
What both publish
| Fact | Apache Trusted Releases | Flagsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The repository recommends running ATR with Docker Compose and documents visiting a local HTTPS address using a self-signed certificate. | Flagsmith offers hosted cloud, private cloud, and self-hosted deployment options. |
| Integrations | Projects can use GitHub Actions for Trusted Publishing when they can demonstrate reproducible builds. | Native integrations include Amplitude, Datadog, Dynatrace, GitHub, GitLab, Grafana, Jira, Mixpanel, New Relic, Segment, Sentry, Slack, Terraform and warehouse tools. |
| License | The ATR site states that its material is licensed under Apache License, version 2.0. | The public Flagsmith repository is identified as BSD-3-Clause licensed. |
Apache Trusted Releases plans
No prices published.
Flagsmith plans
- FreeFree
- Start-Up (annual billing)$40 a month
- Start-Up$40 a month
- Start-Up (monthly billing)$45 a month
- Scale-Up$250 a month
- Scale-Up (annual billing)$250 a month
Pick Apache Trusted Releases if…
ATR is intended for Apache project participants who publish releases and end users who obtain them. Its beta status and lack of stability, security, and compatibility guarantees matter to teams considering deployment.
Pick Flagsmith if…
Flagsmith suits development teams that want to control staged releases or adjust app properties without deploying new code. Its cloud, private-cloud, and self-hosted options support teams with different deployment preferences.