
Apache Hadoop HDFS
7.1#3 in data lake softwareFree planFree planAPILinuxSelf-hostedWindows
Visit

| Fact | Apache Hadoop HDFS | Apache Ozone |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Hadoop 3.5.0 includes a FileSystem implementation for Google Cloud Storage, and its documentation also lists connectors for Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, and Azure Data Lake Storage. | The project lists Hive, Spark, Flink, Iceberg, Trino, Impala, Ranger, Knox, Kerberos, Prometheus, Grafana, Oozie, Hue, HBase, and DistCp as integrations. |
| Interfaces | Applications can use the Java FileSystem API, a C wrapper, WebHDFS REST, browser access or the NFS gateway. | Applications can access Ozone through its S3-compatible REST API, Hadoop-compatible filesystem interface, Java client API, and CLI. |
| License | Apache packages are generally distributed under the OSI-approved Apache License 2.0 unless a package states otherwise. | Apache Ozone is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. |
| Purpose | HDFS is a distributed file system designed for high-throughput access to large application data sets on commodity hardware. | Apache Ozone is a scalable distributed object store designed for lakehouse workloads, AI/ML, and cloud-native applications. |
| Scale | HDFS is designed to scale to hundreds of nodes in a cluster and support tens of millions of files in one instance. | Ozone supports deployments up to billions of objects and exabytes of capacity. |
| Security | Production clusters are expected to use Kerberos for caller authentication and access control. | Ozone supports Kerberos authentication, ACLs, Ranger policy management, TLS/SSL in transit, and TDE at rest. |
| Support | The project asks users not to request private support from its non-paid volunteers and directs help requests to module mailing lists. | The Apache Software Foundation says it does not provide formal or commercial support for its software packages. |
HDFS suits teams handling large application data sets that need distributed storage for batch or streaming workloads. It is less suited to interactive work requiring low latency or arbitrary in-place file updates.
It suits teams building data lakes, lakehouse platforms, or large-scale storage for AI/ML, cloud-native, Hadoop, or Spark workloads. It is for organizations able to deploy and administer self-hosted storage.