Aon Radford McLagan Compensation Database
7.2#1 in salary benchmarking software$1,750 one-timeAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAon Radford McLagan Compensation Database vs Pave Market Data
Pave Market Data
6.8#5 in salary benchmarking softwareFree planFree planWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Aon Radford McLagan Compensation Database | Pave Market Data |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Aon reports more than 8,700 participating organizations, over 30 million employees and coverage in more than 115 countries. | Market Data benchmarks cover more than 200 job families and, in Pro, more than 55 countries and 90 cities or metros, according to the methodology guide. |
| Headquarters | London, England, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Job matching | The Job Matrix provides a job library and descriptions for confirming organizational matches. | Pave uses machine learning to match employee records to its job architecture before aggregating and de-identifying the data. |
| Purpose | The database provides market pay benchmarks and global insights for compensation decisions across industries, regions, roles and markets. | Pave Market Data provides compensation benchmarks to help companies make pay decisions. |
Aon Radford McLagan Compensation Database plans
- Long-Term Incentive Design Study Trends Report$1,750, paid once
- Salary Increase and Turnover Study – Trending Tool$1,750, paid once
- Short-Term Incentive Design Study Trends Report$1,750, paid once
- Short- and Long-Term Incentive Design Study Trends Reports$3,000, paid once
- Radford McLagan Compensation DatabasePriced on request
Pave Market Data plans
- Market Data LiteFree
- Market Data ProPriced on request
Pick Aon Radford McLagan Compensation Database if…
The database is for HR, total rewards, and compensation leaders making pay decisions across roles, industries, and geographies. It may suit organizations seeking either single-country or multi-market benchmarking.
Pick Pave Market Data if…
Pave Market Data suits companies making compensation decisions that can connect their HR platforms. Lite is described for startups with 1–200 employees; Pro is positioned for enterprise benchmarking.