Anteon vs Kubeshark
| Anteon | Kubeshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $99/mo | $30/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Paid from | 99 /mo | 30 /mo |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | Yes |
| Network visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Application tracing | Yes | — |
| Kernel profiling | No | — |
| Supported operating systems | Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+, Debian 10, CentOS 8+) and macOS 10.15+; Windows not supported | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, Kubeshark scores higher on our published basis.