Amazon Interactive Video Service
8.7#3 in live tv streaming servicesFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAmazon Interactive Video Service vs Flussonic
What both publish
| Fact | Amazon Interactive Video Service | Flussonic |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Protocols | Real-time streaming uses RTMPS and WHIP input with WebRTC output; low-latency streaming uses RTMPS and SRT input with HLS output. | It supports delivery over HLS, DASH, WebRTC, MPEG-TS, and other listed protocols. |
| Scale | AWS says IVS channels can scale to streams watched by millions of concurrent viewers. | The product page describes deployments from one stream to 3,000 streams per server and up to 30,000 simultaneous viewers. |
Amazon Interactive Video Service plans
- Advanced SD channel input$0.50 a month
- Advanced HD channel input$0.85 a month
- Real-Time Streaming participant hours$0.07 a month
- Free TierFree
- Basic channel inputPriced on request
- Advanced SD inputPriced on request
Flussonic plans
- Developer limited license$100, paid once
- Flussonic Media Server developer limited license$100, paid once
Pick Amazon Interactive Video Service if…
IVS suits developers building live video applications that need real-time or low-latency delivery, interactive features, or multi-host stages. It also fits workflows that record streams to Amazon S3 for later playback.
Pick Flussonic if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.