EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Amazon CloudWatch Logs vs Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki

8.9#1 in log management softwareFrom $19 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactAmazon CloudWatch LogsGrafana Loki
Deployment optionscloudself-hosted
Free planNoYes
IntegrationsCloudWatch Logs integrates with Amazon OpenSearch Service for querying and analyzing logs without moving or duplicating the data.Official documentation lists Grafana Alloy as the recommended collector and describes OpenTelemetry, Promtail, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, Logstash and other clients.
Live log tailingYesYes
Log pipelinesYesYes
PurposeAmazon CloudWatch collects and stores logs from AWS resources, applications, services, on-premises resources, and other clouds.Loki is a log aggregation system designed to store and query logs from applications and infrastructure.

Amazon CloudWatch Logs plans

  • Logs data ingestion$0.50 a month
  • Logs archive storage$0.03 a month
  • Pay-as-you-go—
  • Free tierFree
  • Paid usage—

Grafana Loki plans

  • Grafana Cloud Logs FreeFree
  • Grafana Loki OSS self-hostedFree
  • Loki (self-hosted)Free
  • Grafana Cloud Logs Pro$19 a month
  • Grafana Cloud Logs Enterprise—

Pick Amazon CloudWatch Logs if…

CloudWatch Logs suits teams that need to collect and analyze logs across AWS, on-premises, or other-cloud workloads. It is also relevant for teams using central cross-account views or the listed monitoring integrations.

Pick Grafana Loki if…

Loki suits teams that need to aggregate and query application or infrastructure logs and can manage a self-hosted deployment or use Grafana Cloud Logs. Its label-based indexing and LogQL are central considerations for selecting it.

Charts they share