am-editor
6.1#17 in rich text editor softwareFree planFree planWebSelf-hosted
Visitam-editor vs Editor.js
What both publish
| Fact | am-editor | Editor.js |
|---|---|---|
| Extensibility | The project describes an out-of-the-box set of dozens of plugins and supports custom mark, inline, block, and card plugins. | Blocks are powered by plugins, and the site says developers can create their own using its API. |
| Installation | The engine can be installed as the @aomao/engine package using npm or yarn. | Developers can install through npm, Yarn, jsDelivr CDN or a local editor.js file. |
| License | The repository publishes the software under the MIT License, which permits free use subject to the license conditions. | The site says Editor.js is released under the Apache 2 License. |
am-editor plans
- MIT LicenseFree
Editor.js plans
- Free and open sourceFree
- Free and open-sourceFree
Pick am-editor if…
am-editor suits developers who need a rich text editor they can adapt with plugins and front-end libraries. It is especially relevant for projects requiring collaborative editing, multimedia content, or localization.
Pick Editor.js if…
Editor.js suits developers who need structured, JSON-based content for web or mobile rendering. It also fits projects that want plugin-built blocks and a self-hosted JavaScript or TypeScript editor.