Agrafa
5.8#42 in container monitoringWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitAgrafa vs Uptrace
What both publish
| Fact | Agrafa | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The installer starts the dashboard and API, available by default on ports 8080 and 8081. | Self-hosted installation options include Docker, Ansible, and Kubernetes, and Linux packages are available for amd64 and arm64. |
| Integrations | Slack and Telegram alert integrations are listed as planned for the next release. | Telemetry can arrive through OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Vector, Fluent Bit and CloudWatch, and Grafana can use Uptrace as Prometheus or Tempo data sources. |
| Intended users | The project README describes Agrafa as monitoring for small deployments, personal infrastructure, and side projects. | The self-hosted editions page describes Community as for individuals, Starter as suitable for side projects, Team as a production default, and Business for reliability and compliance. |
| License | Agrafa is open source under the MIT license. | The main Uptrace repository is licensed AGPL-3.0; several SDK repositories use BSD-2-Clause and the Helm chart uses Apache-2.0. |
| Support | The project invites issue reports and focused pull requests for contributions. | The project directs users to Telegram, Slack and GitHub Discussions for help; paid editions add email, priority, fast-SLA or dedicated support. |
Agrafa plans
No prices published.
Uptrace plans
- CommunityFree
- Uptrace CloudFree
- Starter$39 a month
- Team$199 a month
- Business$499 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Agrafa if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Uptrace if…
Uptrace suits teams that need to correlate traces, metrics, and logs, and choose between cloud and self-hosted deployment. Its listed editions range from Community for individuals to Business for reliability and compliance needs.