AgileLaw
8.1#1 in legal deposition softwareFrom $200 a monthFree planAndroidiOSWebLinux
VisitAgileLaw vs Cerulean
What both publish
| Fact | AgileLaw | Cerulean |
|---|---|---|
| Access controls | The security page describes role-based permissions, audit trails, and logical isolation of each firm's data from other customers. | Security controls include SAML single sign-on, enforced multi-factor authentication, matter-scoped roles and IP allow-listing. |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Integrations | The FAQ names Relativity, Clio, Box and Dropbox as integrations. | The site lists Microsoft Word, SharePoint and NetDocuments integrations, with connectors provisioned per matter. |
| Security | AgileLaw says documents are encrypted at rest with AES-256 and in transit with TLS, and that it is SOC 2 Type II certified and undergoes annual third-party penetration testing. | Each matter is isolated in its own tenant, and client documents are not used to train models. |
AgileLaw plans
- StarterFree
- Starter$195, paid once
- Essentials$200 a month
- Advantage$500 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Cerulean plans
No prices published.
Pick AgileLaw if…
AgileLaw suits solo attorneys, law firms, and litigation teams managing exhibits for proceedings. Its plans range from on-demand host sessions to monthly options for teams needing more sessions and active cases.
Pick Cerulean if…
Cerulean is described for counsel and tribunals handling high-value litigation and arbitration. Its features are aimed at teams working with matter bundles, hearing transcripts, and evidence presentation.