EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

ActiveBatch vs Google Cloud Workflows

What both publish

FactActiveBatchGoogle Cloud Workflows
IntegrationsIts connector library includes integrations for SAP, Oracle, VMware, Informatica, Amazon and Microsoft.Connectors integrate workflows with Google Cloud APIs and handle request formatting, retries, and long-running operations; examples include Pub/Sub, Firestore, and Secret Manager.
MonitoringActiveBatch provides real-time monitoring, customizable alerts and views for machine load, forecasts and Gantt charts.Workflows integrates with Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring for execution logs, volume, error rates, and execution time.
SecurityRedwood says its workload automation solutions use full encryption including TLS 1.3 and SSL and are ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certified.Workflows runs in a sandboxed environment without code or library dependencies that require security patches, and it can use Secret Manager to store and retrieve secrets.

ActiveBatch plans

  • ActiveBatchPriced on request

Google Cloud Workflows plans

  • Always FreeFree
  • Always Free external stepsFree
  • Always Free internal stepsFree
  • Internal steps$0.01 a month
  • Pay as you go$0.01 a month
  • External steps$0.03 a month

Pick ActiveBatch if…

ActiveBatch may suit organizations coordinating processes across IT and business systems in on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Custom roles and visual workflow tools are relevant to teams that include business users.

Pick Google Cloud Workflows if…

Workflows suits teams orchestrating cloud services, APIs, batch jobs, or business and IT processes. It may fit those comfortable defining workflows in YAML or JSON and working within step and duration limits.

Charts they share