EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

StackHawk HawkScan vs w3af

w3af

6.8#5 in penetration testing softwareFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactStackHawk HawkScanw3af
IntegrationsThe documentation lists CI/CD integrations including GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, CircleCI, and Bitbucket Pipelines, plus workflow integrations such as Slack, Jira Cloud, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub CodeQL.The documentation describes Metasploit integration and suggests sending vulnerabilities to an internal issue tracker through its REST API.
SupportThe pricing comparison lists Standard support for Wingman and Enterprise support for Scale.For installation issues, the guide directs users to create a ticket and include their Linux distribution, dependency-install script, pip freeze output, and Python version.
Vulnerability coverageWingman lists examples from more than 150 vulnerability types, including SQL injection, sensitive data exposure, cross-site scripting, and remote code execution.The project repository says the scanner can identify more than 200 vulnerabilities, including cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and OS command injection.

StackHawk HawkScan plans

  • Wingman by StackHawk$10 a month
  • StackHawk ScalePriced on request

w3af plans

  • w3afFree

Pick StackHawk HawkScan if…

HawkScan suits teams scanning web applications and APIs during development, CI/CD, or production. It also fits users working with supported coding agents and hybrid deployments.

Pick w3af if…

w3af is suited to developers and penetration testers conducting web application vulnerability assessments. It is also relevant to teams seeking a scanner they can automate through scripts or a REST API.

Charts they share