Shroud.email
7.9#4 in email alias servicesFrom $35 a yearFree planWebAPImacOSSelf-hosted
VisitShroud.email vs SimpleLogin
SimpleLogin
7.2#8 in email alias servicesFrom $36 a yearFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Shroud.email | SimpleLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Account security | Passkeys and authenticator-app two-factor authentication are supported, and passwords are salted and hashed. | Accounts can be secured with TOTP and/or WebAuthn (FIDO) two-factor authentication. |
| Custom domains | Paid accounts can use owned domains, configure catch-all aliases, and recreate those addresses elsewhere later. | Users can bring their own domain to create aliases and use catch-all addresses. |
| Headquarters | The operator’s registered office is Third Floor, 3 Hill Street, New Town, Edinburgh, EH2 3JP. | Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland |
| Open source | The maker describes the project as open source under the AGPL v3 and provides a Docker Compose deployment for self-hosting. | The service says its components are open source, and that it can be self-hosted. |
Shroud.email plans
- FreeFree
- Paid yearly$35 a year
- Paid—
SimpleLogin plans
- FreeFree
- Premium$36 a year
Pick Shroud.email if…
Shroud.email suits people who want forwarded aliases to protect their main address and remove tracking pixels. Its self-hosted option may suit technically capable users with the required server and storage access.
Pick SimpleLogin if…
SimpleLogin suits people who want to use aliases for incoming and outgoing email instead of exposing a real address. It also fits users who want custom domains, PGP, or self-hosting options.