EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

REGREP vs Semansys Compliance Platform

REGREP logo

REGREP

7.5#3 in regulatory reporting softwareFrom €500 a year
AndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactREGREPSemansys Compliance Platform
API availabilityConverter Pro+ offers batch and API capability through a scoped Solution Layers engagement, and the TIN Validator includes bulk API access.The service exposes a versioned OpenAPI-described REST API with bearer-token authorization and endpoints for XBRL instance processing.
Data residencyRegulatory filing data on the platform is held in the European Union.The company states that customer data and platform infrastructure are hosted within the European Union.
HeadquartersFrankfurt am Main, GermanyThe headquarters is in The Hague, Netherlands, with engineering and operations in Sofia, Bulgaria.
IntegrationsSelf-serve integration supports file upload and API access; deeper system integration is scoped under Solution Layers.Semansys offers a managed service and an API-first platform for software vendors, accounting providers, and ERP integrators to embed compliance features.
Rating on Capterra0.0 out of 5 from 0 reviews.5.0 out of 5 from 1 review
Rating on G20.0 out of 5 from 0 reviews.4.4 out of 5 from 11 reviews

REGREP plans

  • TIN Validator€0.01, paid once
  • FATCA€500 a year
  • Pillar 3 Disclosures€500 a year
  • EBA Single report Pro€600 a year
  • EBA Single report€600 a year
  • CRS / DAC2€1,000 a year

Semansys Compliance Platform plans

  • Custom proposalPriced on request
  • SemansysNextPriced on request

Pick REGREP if…

REGREP suits regulated firms filing across EU, UK and global frameworks, especially those working across multiple reporting regimes. Firms with multiple entities should note that group and consolidated structures require a Solution Layers mandate.

Pick Semansys Compliance Platform if…

It is aimed at enterprises, regulators, software vendors, accounting and advisory firms, and organizations with multi-jurisdiction or business-critical compliance needs. It may be a less efficient fit for straightforward requirements limited to one jurisdiction and document type.

Charts they share