Pronto
6.9#49 in team chat appsAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitPronto vs Zulip
What both publish
| Fact | Pronto | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Channels | Yes | Channels define the audience for conversations and can be public or private. |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Lehi, Utah, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Integrations | Pronto documents integrations with Canvas and Brightspace (D2L), and its API can manage users, groups, and messages. | Zulip lists more than 130 native integrations and hundreds more through Zapier and IFTTT. |
| Security compliance | Pronto’s Trust Center lists an independent SOC 2 Type 2 audit against the Security criteria and Texas DIR Level 2 certification. | Zulip states that Cloud is GDPR and CCPA compliant, while self-hosting can support HIPAA and FERPA requirements. |
| Security controls | The Trust Center lists encryption in transit and at rest, restricted product access, vulnerability management, and incident response controls. | Self-hosted deployments can run behind firewalls or on air-gapped networks and offer configurable password, session, timeout, log-rotation and API-rate-limit policies. |
Pronto plans
- BusinessPriced on request
Zulip plans
- Cloud FreeFree
- Cloud Standard$6.67 a month
- Cloud Plus$10 a month
- Self-hosted FreeFree
- Self-hosted Basic$3.50 a month
- Self-hosted Business$6.67 a month
Pick Pronto if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Zulip if…
Zulip suits teams that want channel-based chat across desktop, mobile, and web platforms. Its cloud and self-hosted options provide different deployment choices.