Promptfoo
7.8#2 in llm evaluation toolsFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitPromptfoo vs PyRIT
What both publish
| Fact | Promptfoo | PyRIT |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | Installation is available through npm, npx, Homebrew, and a project dependency; npm and npx require Node.js 22.22.0 or newer. | The project documents user installation through Docker or locally with pip or uv, plus contributor Docker and local installation options. |
| License | The open-source project is distributed under the MIT license. | The GitHub repository identifies PyRIT as MIT licensed. |
| Red teaming | Its red-team workflow generates adversarial tests for vulnerabilities before deployment and maps testing to OWASP and NIST frameworks. | It supports single-turn and multi-turn attack strategies, including Crescendo, TAP, and Skeleton Key. |
Promptfoo plans
- CommunityFree
- EnterprisePriced on request
- On-PremisePriced on request
PyRIT plans
- PyRITFree
Pick Promptfoo if…
Promptfoo suits developers and enterprise teams evaluating prompts, model outputs, and AI application risks. Its local and self-hosted options may appeal to teams that want to run the Community plan on their own infrastructure.
Pick PyRIT if…
PyRIT suits security professionals and engineers assessing generative AI risks. Its scenario evaluations and team-oriented web interface may fit repeatable or collaborative red-team work.