Porter
6.8#11 in paas toolsFrom $6 a monthWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitPorter vs Zeabur
What both publish
| Fact | Porter | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Users can deploy from Git or Docker, and Porter says it works with any framework. | It supports deploying code from GitHub, templates, Dockerfiles, Docker images, and local project uploads. |
| Founded | 2020 | 2025 |
| Product | Porter deploys and manages applications in a customer's AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud account, with infrastructure operations managed by Porter. | Zeabur describes itself as an AI DevOps engineer that handles deployments. |
| Security | Porter advertises SOC 2 Type II and built-in SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance in the customer's cloud account. | Zeabur says it is pursuing SOC 2 Type II certification and encrypts customer connections with TLS 1.2 or higher. |
| Support | The Enterprise plan includes premium support, and eligible higher-usage customers can qualify for private support. | The pricing page lists a four-working-day first-response target on Free and 36 hours on paid plans, with express passes guaranteeing 36 hours during working hours. |
Porter plans
- Standard$6 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Zeabur plans
- FreeFree
- Dev$5 a month
- Pro$19 a month
- Team$79 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Porter if…
Porter suits teams deploying applications to their own AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure accounts while outsourcing infrastructure operations. It is relevant for teams needing Git or Docker deployment, CI/CD, workloads, audit logs, and hybrid deployment.
Pick Zeabur if…
Zeabur suits developers who want to deploy projects from repositories, images, or local uploads and manage servers, domains, or email. Teams that need collaboration and role controls can consider the Team plan.