EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

OWASP DefectDojo vs Turing Security Center

What both publish

FactOWASP DefectDojoTuring Security Center
GovernancePro lists SSO using SAML 2.0 or OIDC, granular RBAC, a full audit trail, SLA enforcement, and audit-ready reporting.Governance functions listed by the vendor include visibility, prioritization, policies, compliance, dashboards, and workflow building.
IntegrationsThe vendor lists more than 500 supported security tools, including SAST, DAST, SCA, cloud, container, modeling, and ticketing systems.The vendor lists integrations covering code repositories, SAST/SCA and licensing, CSPM, multi-cloud, patch management, ticketing, TPRM, vulnerability management, EDR, attack-surface management, SIEM, workflow automation, asset discovery, compliance, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
Self-hostingThe open-source edition can be started with Docker Compose, while Pro supports SaaS or self-hosted Kubernetes and Docker Compose deployments.The opened vendor homepage does not state a self-hosted or on-premises deployment option.

OWASP DefectDojo plans

  • Community EditionFree
  • Pay As You Go$100 a month
  • Pro Pay As You Go$100 a month
  • Pre-Pay & Save—
  • Pro Pre-Pay—

Turing Security Center plans

  • StarterR$2,000 a month
  • ProfessionalR$6,000 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick OWASP DefectDojo if…

DefectDojo suits security teams that need to aggregate scanner results, track remediation, and connect findings to ticketing systems. It also offers governance and risk-prioritization tools for organizations using Pro.

Pick Turing Security Center if…

It suits small, growing, and large organizations that need centralized security workflows, governance, and integrations.

Charts they share