Oversecured
6.8#3 in mobile application security testing software$1,000 usage-basedAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitOversecured vs Q-mast
What both publish
| Fact | Oversecured | Q-mast |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The platform lists CLI, MCP, REST API, CI/CD integrations, and webhooks for Slack, Jira, email, or custom endpoints. | The product page lists GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Appium, and Snyk integrations or connections. |
| Support | The pricing page lists email and site-widget support for Hacker and Business, and a dedicated manager plus Slack channel for Enterprise. | Quokka directs customers to log in with customer credentials to access its knowledge base library. |
Oversecured plans
- Hacker$500, paid once
- Business$1,000 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Q-mast plans
No prices published.
Pick Oversecured if…
Oversecured may suit teams assessing Android or iOS app security, including teams that need dynamic or authenticated testing. Its plans and deployment options include per-scan, per-app, and custom enterprise arrangements.
Pick Q-mast if…
Q-mast suits developers who need to assess iOS or Android app binaries as part of their software development lifecycle. It may also fit teams reviewing mobile-app dependencies and SDK behavior.