openmux
6.4#7 in terminal multiplexersFree planFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
Visitopenmux vs RMUX
What both publish
| Fact | openmux | RMUX |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | The project documents installation via curl, npm, Bun, source build, and GitHub release binaries. | Install options include package managers, prebuilt installers, and Cargo; the docs say quick installers verify SHA256. |
| License | The repository identifies the software as MIT licensed. | RMUX is dual-licensed under MIT or Apache License 2.0. |
| Platforms | The README lists prebuilt binaries for macOS Apple Silicon and Linux x64 / arm64. | RMUX documents native support for Windows, macOS, and Linux; Windows uses ConPTY and named pipes, while macOS and Linux use Unix PTYs and Unix-domain sockets. |
| Security | The repository page shows zero security advisories. | During Web Share, shells and PTYs stay on the local daemon while the browser decrypts encrypted terminal updates locally; tunnels carry encrypted frames. |
openmux plans
- openmuxFree
RMUX plans
- RMUXFree
Pick openmux if…
openmux suits terminal users on Linux or macOS who want pane layouts, multiple workspaces, and persistent sessions. Its CLI and PTY browser may also suit users who manage several terminal processes.
Pick RMUX if…
RMUX suits developers who want persistent local terminal sessions or programmatic control through an SDK. Its browser sharing and access roles may also suit people who need to share a pane or session with others.