Loki Automation
6.0#17 in ai video restoration softwareFrom $1,639 a yearWebAPIWindows
VisitLoki Automation vs Pixop
What both publish
| Fact | Loki Automation | Pixop |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Fakenham, Norfolk, England, United Kingdom | Odense, Denmark |
| Integrations | Filmworkz says Loki can operate alongside Phoenix and third-party systems including Resolve, Mistika and Scratch. | Official integrations include TVU MediaMesh, Mimir from Fonn Group, Fonn Group workflows and Silverdraft hardware. |
| Purpose | Loki automates restoration, enhancement, conversion and delivery workflows using Filmworkz DVO Tools. | Pixop provides machine-learning video enhancement for broadcasters, streamers, and media companies. |
Loki Automation plans
- Loki Render$149 a month
- Loki Render$1,639 a year
- Loki 2.0 — Full VersionPriced on request
Pixop plans
- AWS Marketplace Pixop creditFree
- Storage$0.02 a month
- Pixop Super Resolution$0.08, paid once
- Download$0.09, paid once
- Pixop Denoiser$0.41, paid once
- Pixop Deep Restoration 2$0.49, paid once
Pick Loki Automation if…
Loki suits restoration artists, broadcasters, post-production facilities, and archives automating media processing. It can fit users scaling from a workstation to a network setup, though the Render subscription is limited to one machine.
Pick Pixop if…
It suits broadcasters, streaming services, and media companies handling archive, live, or file-based enhancement workflows. Teams should assess API, deployment, storage, and billing requirements.